London Riots: Criminals? Yes – but that doesn’t mean society isn’t broken

20110811-115145.jpg

The riots are, for now at least, over and so the search for reason begins.

But let us first talk about what it wasn’t. This was no cry for help from a social underclass with no other outlet for their frustrations. We now know that, along with the teenagers and the long-term unemployed were teachers, graphic designers and many, many graduates with good jobs.

Neither was this a response to the cutting of Educational Maintenance Allowances, or any other cuts come to that – including police cuts. Any Labour MP suggesting otherwise should have their comments immediately disowned by Ed Miliband and be made to sit on the naughty step.

It was coordinated violence and theft perpertrated by criminals against their own communities. All those caught should be tried and sentenced under the full force of law. If they lose their jobs and their homes, so be it – if you show complete disregard for your community then why should your community show regard for you?

That said, when we see teenagers, even pre-teens (the youngest person charged to date is 11-years old) stealing, setting fire to buildings, throwing bricks at the police it is clear something has gone very wrong indeed.

For me, it is the product of a myriad of reasons both political and social – starting in the Thatcher era (maybe before, but for people of my generation history pretty much begins with Thatcher) and continuing to present day – all of which have ripped the heart out of community cohesion.

Politically, there has been a prolonged and systemic attack on the value of community. Under Thatcher’s Government for sure, but an attack that continued, albeit less obviously, under Labour and has shown no signs of stopping with the coalition. Instead of communities, we talk of ‘hard-working families’ – leading to a sense that your responsibility starts and ends at your front door. This is fine when things are going well, but what about when you are struggling and need help and support? Too often we live in a tiny cocoon unaware of what is going on around us and unwilling to find out. When was the last time you checked in on your neighbour, just to see how they are?

At the the same time (and linked to the above) we have seen a delegation of responsibility from communities to the state. There is a reason that police didn’t used to have to focus on low-level anti-social behaviour – the community policed it themselves. I remember once, when I was a teenager, coming home to an angry looking father who had been told by a neighbour that I had been swearing in the street, hardly knife crime I grant you, but enough nonetheless for a stern rebuke and an active disincentive for me to be caught doing it again. This type of anecdote seems barely plausible in a modern society. In Clapham, a group of nearly 70 people stood outside a pub watching as teenagers looted shops along St Johns Road, some even wandering down the street, taking photos to post on twitter – looting became a spectator sport, rather than something to confront and admonish.

We live in a more transient society, particularly within our cities. Knowing you are probably not going to be in the same place for more than a year or two acts as a disincentive to get to know those living around you, which is fine except when you do choose to settle down you have forgotten how to. Not knowing your neighbours, the person who serves your coffee every morning or sells you your newspaper means a disengagement from the community around you. I know it sounds all very fluffy, but again I grew up in a place where you knew the people who owned and worked in local businesses. I went to school with their kids, given this, looting and arson was really not on the agenda.

In trying to build a more equal society, it feels at times we have actually built a more expectant one. A society where too many people feel entitled. And entitled to the wrong things – not high quality education, a world-class health service and a helping hand when things are tough but instead a well-paying job without putting the effort in to get it, the latest phone/TV/pair of trainers, respect without earning it. I am not going Tory here, but it is important to speak up when we have got things wrong, and this is one of those areas.

Finally, our establishment is broken. We have a political class that is not just untrusted (which is hardly a new phenomena) but increasingly disengaged and out-of-touch with the lives of their constituents. I am not against people going straight from University to work on the parliamentary estate before being parachuted into a seat, but when this becomes the primary route to becoming an MP we have a problem. Diversity is not just about race, gender, sexuality and disability. It is about class, profession and experience. But this is not just a political problem – trust in all areas of public life is at an all time low. The Police are seen as corrupt and, at times, inept; our Press is untrusted and in a fight for it’s life in a brave new digital world; and who would be a social worker or a senior manager in a local authority? Without respect and trust in those who work on our behalf and belief in the media who help hold them to account then how can people hold out hope for a better life?

Complex problems require long-term solutions brought about by high-quality debate from our country’s brightest people – something which I hope will start today with the recall of parliament (though I fear not). But we can all do our bit to help mend society – next time you see someone upset in the street, go and ask if they are OK; smile at strangers (and not just the attractive ones); look people in the eye; have your neighbours round for drinks, find out the name of your local shopkeeper; get involved in a local club or society – this is your community, don’t be a bystander.

Try and remember that most journalists are good journalists

I am guessing it must feel pretty shitty to be a journalist right now. The phone-hacking revelations of the last few days has shone a bright light into the sometimes murky world of journalism and it’s not been pretty. Listening in to voicemails of desperate and grieving people or abducted children is just plain wrong and those that did it, sanctioned it, or just knew about it but did nothing should rightly be vilified.

It is important however that we don’t tar every journalist, or even most journalists, with the same brush. Just like politicians (who felt the same glare into their archaic expenses systems not so long ago) the vast majority of those working in the press are hard-working, diligent and honest. They also do an essential job in preserving democracy and holding those in power to account.

Whilst we are pouring scorn on their profession, we should remember it was journalists who discovered and broke this story – without them we would all still be in the dark. And it is not just on this occasion – MP’s expenses, Westland, Profumo to name but three other major scandals of the last 60years that in all likelihood would have remained secret without good journalism. Away from political scandal for a moment as I write this tens of thousands of people are dying of starvation in Africa, millions more have been displaced. I only know this because of journalists who are willing to go out to countries like Ethiopia, Somalia and Kenya to dig out stories and bring back to the UK. The same happened back in the mid-1980′s when Michael Burke presented a series of short news pieces from Ethiopia – thank to those films the public started to engage in international development and fundraising events like Live Aid and, of course, Comic Relief, were born.

Yes some journalists are bad and dishonest, but then what profession doesn’t have a few bad apples? And yes, sometimes even good journalists, in fact, especially good journalists will use morally debatable means to get to a story – but if that means we know that Chris Huhne is a liar, or that Nixon was corrupt then it is the price we pay for holding power to account.

Clegg’s biggest challenge – the future of his party and the country is down to him.

It is fair to say that Nick Clegg is not quite where he intended to be, the dream of 100+ seats is, for now, just that. There is no doubt that the failure to realise the potential of the early polls will impact on his negotiating position. However, whatever he might of said on the steps of Lib-Dem HQ the fact remains that neither Labour or the Tories can govern without him; he is still the kingmaker and he knows it. The next 48hours will be the toughest of his leadership and could well make or break the party for a generation. Get it right and proportional representation and the hard wiring of a genuine three-party system in Westminster follows. Get it wrong and the Lib-Dems risk being split right down the middle and ceasing to be any kind of force in British politics for a generation.

I am a recent convert to the Lib-Dem cause. Their manifesto really resonated with me – particularly their focus on fairness. But right at the heart of my support is their passionate campaigning for meaningful electoral reform. As I have written in previous posts – it seems to me that unless you get this right you haven’t a hope on any of the other major challenges facing the country. And it is this that has to be Nick Clegg’s price for co-operation.

I have never been shy about suggesting my ideal in this election was a hung parliament, delivering a workable Lib-Lab coalition that could make real progress on electoral reform and finally lock out the damaging forces of conservatism. It is still possible that this might happen and, until it can’t be done it will always be my preferred option. That said, I respect Nick Clegg’s decision to stick to what he said in the campaign and publicly state that the party with the biggest share of the votes and the largest number of seats should have the right to try and form a government first. Him talking to the Tories first is not a betrayal of his party, it is a reinforcement of his values and a reminder of his strength as a leader.

Talking to the Tories is one thing, agreeing to support, or even join them in government is quite another. Whatever David Cameron suggested earlier today about common-ground between the parties, there is just too much of a gap in both policies and values for any meaningful coalition to take place. I know I would not be the only one to find it very difficult to support a party working alongside the Tories. There is one exception to this however:  If Nick Clegg could negotiate commitment to a referendum on proportional representation followed by a 2nd general election all within an 18month time period then I could support the Lib-Dems working as part of a national stability government with the Tories. But it has to be this, any compromise from the central goal of electoral reform cannot be countenanced.

If, as I suspect is the case, Cameron is not willing to offer this then the only thing for Clegg to do is to work with the Labour Party (minus a certain Gordon Brown) and the nationalists to deliver exactly the same, probably within a shorter timescale. Doing nothing is not an option – letting a new government collapse and forcing a snap 2nd election will only weaken their hand with the country taking the decision in their own hands and almost definitely delivering a working Tory majority. Once this has happened so has his chance for any meaningful reform.

This is a huge 48 hours for Nick Clegg and for the future of politics in the UK – I am supporting him all the way in his negotiations, I just hope that he can deliver.

Reflections on Election Day and a call to protest

First may I apologise in advance for any typos, spelling mistakes or poor grammer… I, like a lot of you, have not really slept since Wednesday. I just wanted to get a few thoughts down whilst they were still fresh in my mind.

Over the last 24 hours there have been literally hundreds of stories playing themselves out up and down the country – some of success, some of despair and a number of utter shock and surprise. There have for me however been a few things that have stuck out.

1) Despite the millions of pounds spent, the thousands of leaflets, billboards and mailings, the hundreds of hours of TV and Radio and even the 3  leaders debates no single party has managed to win the trust of the majority of the public. No party, on its own, has a mandate to govern. The public has punished all parties in the poetic way that only democracy can bring. Whether it is the financial crisis, MPs expenses or a damning indictment on the current electoral system, politicians of all political persuasion need to work hard over the coming weeks and years to win back trust and authority.
2) Brown has to go – both as leader and PM. Not straight away perhaps, indeed he is right to stay on until the whole political situation becomes clearer, but in the coming days he is going to have to tender his resignation. Labour’s poor campaign and inability to command a fourth term was as much about the country’s dislike of Brown as any wholesale rejection of the party’s policies. Any potential collaboration with the Lib-Dems will depend entirely on him going and, even if this doesn’t come about, it is time
2nd – brown has to go
3rd – clegg, along with all other progressives need to force a referendum on the electoral system. Reviews are not enough, need commitment

Copenhagen – I am trying to get excited

Today sees the start of what has been billed as the ‘most important conference in the history of the planet’. Clumsy rhetoric aside it does seem that the negotiators have an incredible mountain to climb if any meaningful agreement is to be reached.

I am one of millions of people who dutifully seperate out their recycling every week, use low-energy bulbs, we even drive a Prius! I understand the world is warming and, collectively speaking, it is our fault – but yet still I can’t get excited about it and I am not alone.

The real challenge for global leaders over the next two weeks is not the inevitable horsetrading and compromise that comes with kind of summit. The challenge is to fully engage the public with the facts of climate change, the clear and present danger that it represents and to offer practical, substantial and long-term measures in which to fight it.

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone